Section One - Continued
TREATMENT OF OBESITY
Treatment for obesity has not generally been successful. The majority of
individuals who lose weight gain it back within a short time period. According
to a report by the Institute of Medicine entitled Weighing the Options,
typically over two-thirds of weight lost by an individual will be regained
within one year and almost all within five years (77). Many of these persons
will lose the weight again, only to regain it once more. This is referred
to as weight cycling, or yo-yo dieting. There has been much debate on the
health consequences of loss and regain. A review of studies conducted by
the National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity between
1964 and 1994, however, does not support the idea that yo-yo dieting has
long-term detrimental effects on an individual’s health. The consensus
was that weight cycling does not result in an increase in body fat nor does
it have negative effects on cholesterol and insulin levels or on blood pressure
(78).
Part of the problem with weight regain lies with changes that occur
to a person’s “set point,” or resting metabolic rate,
following a weight loss. Numerous studies have shown that energy expenditure
decreases with weight loss, producing the weight cycling described above.
An analysis by Leibel et al. measured the 24-hour total energy expenditure
among both obese and nonobese individuals at their usual body weight,
after losing 10% to 20% of initial weight, and after gaining 10% of initial
weight through overfeeding. All subjects, obese and nonobese, showed an
increase in metabolic rate with weight gain and a decrease in metabolism
with weight loss. These changes occurred in both resting and nonresting
metabolism and were in a direction tending to return the subject to his
or her initial weight (79). The decrease in metabolic rate following a
weight loss served us well in times when we did not have unlimited access
to food. As Kelly Brownell of Yale University explains, “In an ancient
environment that was a way to survive the next famine” (80). That
same mechanism, however, makes it harder for dieters to maintain a healthy
weight today.
Wing and Hill, in a study using data from the National Weight Control
Registry, found that more than 20% of overweight persons who lost at least
10% of their initial body weight were able to maintain the loss for at
least one year, a more optimistic estimate than many previous studies
(81). In addition, they found that weight loss maintenance appears to
get easier over time; once a weight loss was maintained for two to five
years, long-term success was more likely. The persons who were successful
in long-term weight loss studied by Wing and Hill shared important maintenance
strategies: (1) a low-fat diet; (2) frequent self-monitoring of body weight
and food intake, and (3) high levels of physical activity. As noted, physical
activity is crucial in maintaining a weight loss, especially with a reduced
metabolic rate.
Low-Calorie Diet. It has been estimated that at any given time approximately
50% of women and 25% of men are trying to lose weight, with an annual
expenditure of $30 billion on weight loss treatments (82). Not surprisingly,
there has been a proliferation of diets in the past decade or so, ranging
from high-protein to low-carbohydrate to high-carbohydrate to low-fat,
to diets based on the glycemic index, and to hundreds of others, most
of which limit one’s consumption to particular food groups at the
expense of the others. While recognizing that dietary therapy should be
tailored to the individual’s needs, the National Institutes of Health
recommends a low-calorie diet utilizing foods from all food groups that
creates a deficit of 500 to 1,000 kcal/day as an integral part of any
weight loss regimen (3). Saturated fat should be decreased, with total
fat consumption of 30% or less of total calories. Fat reduction must be
accompanied by reduced dietary carbohydrate consumption to produce the
caloric deficit necessary to lose weight. A balanced diet integrating
all food groups is viewed as necessary to promote long-term adherence
to a weight management program.
The NIH recommends that “the initial goal of weight loss therapy
should be to reduce body weight by approximately 10% from baseline. With
success, further weight loss can be attempted if indicated through further
assessment (3).” In addition, a reasonable time line for a 10% reduction
in body weight is six months of therapy. To prevent weight cycling, the
NIH recommends a weight maintenance program that combines dietary therapy,
physical activity, and behavior therapy, i.e., learning life-long eating
skills, the same strategies found among successful dieters by Wing and
Hill.
Pharmacologic Treatment of Obesity. Drug therapy is often used as a component
of weight-loss treatment, along with diet, physical activity, and behavior
modification. Normally drug therapy is recommended only if the subject
has a BMI of 30 or greater, or 27 or greater with at least one comorbid
condition (83). The four classes of medications currently available or
under investigation for the treatment of obesity include:
- appetite suppressants such as sibutramine (Meridia®, Reductil®)
- thermogenic or metabolism-raising agents (e.g., nonprescription ephedrine/caffeine
agents)
- digestive inhibitors, which block the absorption of fat in the digestive
tract (e.g., Xenical®)
- peptides that have been shown to reduce appetite (e.g., leptin and cholecystokinin),
none of which were approved by the FDA at time of this report.
Drug therapy requires physician monitoring to assure patient safety because
of possible side effects associated with the medications. Sibutramine
currently is the only appetite-suppressing drug approved by the FDA for
long-term use, i.e., up to one year; all others are primarily useful in
initiating treatment or in helping a patient who is relapsing.
Bariatric Surgery. For the severely obese, those with a BMI of 40 or
greater or a BMI of 35 or greater with comorbid conditions, surgical treatment
is the only proven long-term weight-control (84). Bariatric surgery involves
limiting the amount of food an individual can consume at one sitting by
one of two methods. The Vertical Banded Gastroplasty uses restrictive
bands to create a small pouch in the stomach that empties into the remaining
larger portion of the stomach. The patient feels full as soon as the small
pouch is filled and will experience nausea, vomiting, or pain if he or
she continues to eat. The Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass decreases the size
of the stomach by stapling across the top. A portion of the small intestine
is then attached directly to the pouch created, thus bypassing the larger
portion of the stomach and part of the small intestine.
Patients typically lose from 50% to 60% of their initial weight, and
weight maintenance has been found to be successful in most cases (85).
As the prevalence of obesity, and severe obesity in particular, increases,
so does the number of bariatric procedures performed. According to Dr.
Kenneth Jones, president of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery,
some 75,000 procedures will be performed in 2002, up from approximately
45,000 in 2001 and 25,000 in 1999 (86). Bariatric patients require medical
monitoring for the rest of their lives as medical complications such as
vitamin B-12 deficiency and anemia can occur.
Prevention of Obesity. Because obesity is so hard to treat, much emphasis
is now being placed on the primary prevention of overweight and obesity
in both children and adults. Research suggests that there are many promising
areas for interventions for obesity prevention. For example, while breast
feeding is acknowledged as superior to bottle feeding for many reasons,
recent studies have found that breast-fed babies are less likely to be
overweight at the age of five or six (87). Additionally, breast-feeding
mothers lose weight after pregnancy more effectively than other mothers.
Limiting television viewing time among children is an important strategy;
a recent study from Stanford University showed that third- and fourth-graders
who reduced their television viewing had statistically significant decreases
in BMI, regardless of how they spent the reallocated time (88). Results
from the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH),
which included nutritional interventions at 96 elementary schools (56
with interventions and 40 control schools) throughout the U.S. between
1991-94, showed significant reductions in total and saturated fat consumption
among those students at the schools with the interventions (89).
Work site interventions can have a marked impact on adult dietary habits.
The WellWorks Study, a two-year randomized, controlled study of interventions
implemented at 24 work sites in Massachusetts, showed significant reductions
in the percentage of calories consumed as fat and increased consumption
of fruits and vegetables among workers at the intervention sites (90).
Although the results were not sustained when the campaign ended, an intervention
combining a community-based educational program with public relations
activities that was aimed at persuading consumers to switch from high-fat
to low-fat milk succeeded in changing milk-drinking habits during the
campaign, providing evidence that such coverage can be helpful (91).
In addition to work site, school, and other microenvironmental interventions,
macroenvironmental and public health policy changes have been suggested
as potential obesity prevention approaches. Examples of these include
mass media campaigns, increased availability of fitness facilities, taxes
on high-fat and high-sugar foods, controlling of junk food advertising
during children’s television programming, and restoration of daily
physical activity in all schools. Section Three of this document discusses
the public health approach in addressing policy and environmental changes
in West Virginia.
The obesity epidemic is a result of many factors coming together; the
solution lies in addressing all of these factors on all levels. Change
must occur within the individual, the community, and our culture. The
obesity problem in West Virginia is severe, as the data presented in Section
Two indicate. The health consequences for our state residents are already
evident and alarming and will only worsen without rapid and intensive
intervention on every level of society.
End of Section One - Continue with Section Two
Top of Page
|