Response to Comments - explanations
nThere are major differences between epidemiological studies of mercury’s effects. nAbout one in six women in the US have blood mercury levels equal to or greater than 3.5 ug/L.  Some researchers believe babies of these mothers are at “increased risk” of subtle neurological damage. nMercury measured in rain in Chicago and Detroit is not “unsafe”  for humans.
There are major differences between studies of mercury’s effects.  The Faroe Island study found adverse health effects at 1-2 ppm in the mother’s hair, while no effects were seen in the Seychelles Island study at an average of 6.8 ppm in the mother’s hair.  Differences between study design, the population studied, the type of mercury-containing fish eaten (people in the Faroe Islands eat pilot whales containing about 3 ppm mercury, 50% of which was methylmercury), the confounding of other contaminants (PCBs were in the fish eaten in the Faroe Islands).

Some people have interpreted the Faroe Island study, where a measurable effect was observed in all people in the study, to mean that effects from mercury exposure can be measured for all exposures to mercury.  This is conclusion is incorrect.  As noted previously, other studies have shown no measurable effect for people with more exposure to mercury than in the Faroe Islands.

Six percent of women have mercury levels in their blood between 5.8 and 58 ug/L, within a factor of 10 of the level (58 ug/L) where adverse neurological effects have been observed.

About one in six (or 16%) women in the US have blood mercury levels equal to or greater than 3.5 ug/L.  This blood mercury level is lower than blood mercury levels corresponding to exposures equal to the Reference Dose, 5.8 ug/L.  Human studies have correlated maternal blood mercury levels to health effects occurring to their fetuses.  However, the researchers who believe this correlation has not been adequately considered are those who suspect babies are at “increased risk” of subtle neurological damage when maternal blood levels are 3.5 ug/L.  This opinion is not shared by all researchers.

It is important to point out that the term “increased risk” is not the same as “measured adverse health effects.”

One comment was that rain in Chicago contained 42 times the mercury allowed by federal standards and 65 times the amount “safe” for humans in Detroit.  It is inappropriate to compare the mercury in rainfall to standards for mercury in Great Lakes and water that is safe for wildlife.  These standards are established to keep mercury in surface waters at amounts where mercury levels in fish and other wildlife should stay below certain amounts.  In fact, the amount of mercury in rain in these cities was much lower than the federal standard for mercury in drinking water.