|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Cell phones should be turned off or on vibrate
- Limit side bars as it can be a distraction to the group
- If you have questions related to the material, please put them on
cards. We will have times in the agenda set aside to address them.
|
|
5
|
- Participants will understand the value of measuring outcomes for all
infants, toddlers and their families
- Participants will be introduced to the OSEP Child Outcomes and
indicators and WV ‘s Outcome Measurement System
- Participants will be trained in the intended use of the Child Outcome
Summary Tool
|
|
6
|
- Age of accountability
- Accountability increasingly means looking at results – not just process
- Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is under increasing pressure
to produce outcomes data on children (ages birth to five) participating
in early childhood programs
|
|
7
|
- Results not demonstrated
- Part C
- “While the program has met its goal relating to the number of children
served, it has not collected information on how well the program is
doing to improve the educational and developmental outcomes of infants
and toddlers served.”
|
|
8
|
- Part B Preschool
- “The Department has no performance information on preschool children
with disabilities by this program.”
- Note: ‘Department’ refers to the U.S. Department of Education
|
|
9
|
- Require states to submit outcomes data in their Annual Performance
Report (APR) on key indicators of
quality services and supports
- States are required to report on child and family outcomes for all
children and families receiving early intervention or special education
services under IDEA
|
|
10
|
- To document the system’s effectiveness
- To improve services to children and families
- To allocate needed resources such as technical assistance
|
|
11
|
- Five year federally funded project to research, provide technical
assistance and support states in designing a child outcome measurement
system
- Develop national child and family outcomes
- Crosswalks of assessment tools to child outcomes
- Guidance to states on designing child and family outcome measurement
systems
|
|
12
|
- Positive social emotional skills (including positive social
relationships)
- Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early
language/communication)
- Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs
|
|
13
|
- a. % of infants and toddlers who did not improve functioning
- b. % of infants and toddlers who improved functioning, but not
sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same age peers
- c. % of infants and toddlers who
improved functioning to a level nearer to same-age peers but did not
reach it
|
|
14
|
- % of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same age peers
- % of infants and toddlers who maintained
functioning at a level comparable to same-age peers
|
|
15
|
- Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early
intervention services have helped the family:
- Know their rights;
- Effectively communicate their children’s needs; and
- Help their children develop and learn
|
|
16
|
- % of parents with a child receiving special education who report that
schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services
and results for children with disabilities
|
|
17
|
- WV Birth to Three, in collaboration with WV Department of Education,
Special Education, have kicked off the Making A Difference Initiative to
design and implement a child and family outcome measurement system to
meet our obligations to OSEP.
|
|
18
|
- Through this initiative, practitioners will understand the importance
of:
- Linking assessment to intervention
- How on-going authentic assessment can inform the team when a change in
intervention strategies or services is needed
- Evaluating child progress over time, instead of during diagnostic
testing
|
|
19
|
- Major changes have occurred in the last 15 years in how assessment of
young children is viewed
- On-going assessment is part of high quality early childhood programs
- Use of curriculum-based tools reflects
best practice
|
|
20
|
- We should be getting a rich picture of what a child can and can’t do and
use the information to help family and other caregivers to help the
child acquire new skills
|
|
21
|
- Even though the disability community has designed many wonderful
curriculum-based assessments, many early interventionists do not
understand or use on-going assessment to support children/families
- The early childhood community is taking the lead on this best practice
|
|
22
|
- Developmental assessment should be a dynamic, ongoing, multi-dimensional
and individual process
- Developmental assessment should guide the design and implementation of
early intervention services, supports and activities
|
|
23
|
- Assessment means working together as a team to learn about the child
|
|
24
|
- Assessment should take into
account all aspects of the baby or young child’s development
|
|
25
|
- An assessment should give a
picture of the child in different settings, and gather information from
many people, with the family playing an important role
|
|
26
|
- Professionals who assess young children should understand the
sequences, timetables, and variations of typical development
|
|
27
|
- The assessment process should identify the child’s current strengths
and abilities as well as competencies that will help the child develop
further
|
|
28
|
- Assessment should feel like help
|
|
29
|
- The process of assessment should always be viewed as the first step in
a potential intervention process
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- “…To enable young children to be active and successful participants
during the early childhood years and in the future in a variety of
settings – in their homes with their families, in child care, in
preschool programs, and in the community.”
|
|
32
|
- Assists the child in participating within the context of everyday living
- Emphasizes how the child is able to integrate skills across domains to
carry out complex meaningful behaviors
- An outcome is “ a benefit experienced as a result of services received”
|
|
33
|
- Initiate affection toward caregivers and respond to others’ affection
- Watch what a peer says or does and incorporate it into his/her own play
- Point to indicate needs or wants
- Use a skill in actions across settings and situations to accomplish
something meaningful to the child
|
|
34
|
- Even in the best system, some children will not achieve all of the
desired outcomes, but we should expect all children to make progress
toward the outcomes
- Children with severe disabilities may make slower progress toward these outcomes
- However, with accommodations and supports, even children with severe
disabilities should be able to make progress toward these functional
outcomes
|
|
35
|
- The COST is a tool for summarizing information related to a child’s
progress toward each of the three functional outcome areas required by
OSEP
- Information can include norm or curriculum referenced assessments,
parent report on child skills or behaviors, progress notes from team
members working with the child, observations and/or other sources of
information
|
|
36
|
- The COST is not an assessment instrument.
- Does not require teams to gather any additional information than they
should be gathering now
- Is facilitated by trained developmental specialists
|
|
37
|
- For children referred on or after March 1, 2007 in Regions III, IV, VI
and VII and Barbour, Randolph and Taylor
- 1) At initial eligibility/ IFSP meeting
- 2) At annual IFSP meeting, if a COST has been completed previously
- 3) At exit, if a COST has been completed previously and the child has
had an active IFSP for 6 months or more
|
|
38
|
- For children referred on or after January 1, 2008 in Regions I, II, VIII
and Lewis, Preston, and Tucker
and Upshur Counties
- 1) At initial eligibility/ IFSP meeting
- 2) At annual IFSP meeting, if a COST has been completed previously
- 3) At exit, if a COST has been completed previously and the child has
had an active IFSP for 6 months or more
|
|
39
|
- How is the COST to be completed?
- The Child Outcome Summary Tool is completed for all eligible children
as part of the conversation around the child’s present levels of
development during the eligibility/ IFSP process
|
|
40
|
- How is the COST information used to inform the IFSP and practice?
- The COST assists the team, including the family, to synthesize the rich
information gathered around the child’s developmental skills across
daily activities and routines. This information will help the team plan
outcomes and strategies for the IFSP, and monitor the child’s on-going
progress
|
|
41
|
- Involves:
- Relating with adults
- Relating with other children
- For older children- following rules related to groups or interacting
with others
- Includes areas like:
- Attachment/separation/ autonomy
- Expressing emotions and feelings
- Learning rules and expectations
- Social interactions and play
|
|
42
|
- Involves:
- Thinking
- Reasoning
- Remembering
- Problem-solving
- Using symbols and language
- Understanding physical and social worlds
- Includes:
- Early concepts – symbols, pictures, numbers, classification, spatial
relationships
- Imitation
- Object permanence
- Expressive language and communication
|
|
43
|
- Involves:
- Taking care of basic needs
- Getting from place to place
- Using tools
- In older children, contributing to their own health and safety
- Includes:
- Integrating motor skills to complete tasks
- Self-help skills (e.g., dressing, feeding, grooming, toileting,
household responsibility)
- Acting on the world to get what one wants
|
|
44
|
- Early intervention should strive to achieve the three outcomes for all
children receiving services
|
|
45
|
- Achievement of outcomes is age-based, (e.g., children of different ages
will demonstrate achievement in different ways)
- There are many pathways to competence for children with atypical
development (e.g., using sign language, wheel chair, etc).
|
|
46
|
- Outcomes refer to how a child functions across a variety of settings,
including use of assistive technology or other supports
- Outcomes reflect the child’s everyday functioning – not what the child
is capable of under ideal or highly unusual circumstances
|
|
47
|
- To what extent does this child show behaviors and skills related to this
outcome appropriate for his or her age across a variety of settings and
situations?
- Has the child shown any new skills or behaviors related to this outcome
since the last outcomes summary? (yes-no)
|
|
48
|
- Ratings on each outcome are a snapshot of
- The whole child
- Functioning
- A variety of settings and situations
- Rather than viewing development
- Skill by skill
- In one standardized way, or
- by single domains
|
|
49
|
- Ratings will be completed for every child across all three Child
Outcomes
- Ratings are needed in all areas even if:
- No one has concerns about a child’s development
- A child has delays in one or two outcomes, but not in all three
outcomes
|
|
50
|
- The person/group making the rating needs to reach consensus on rating
the child’s current function on each outcome.
- Descriptions of Ratings
- Completely
- Somewhat
- Emerging
- Not Yet
- Check the box that most clearly represents the child’s functioning
|
|
51
|
- Child shows behaviors and skills expected in all or almost all everyday
situations that are part of a child’s life
- home, store, park, child care, with strangers, etc.
- Behaviors and skills are considered typical for his/her age.
- No concerns about delays on any of the components of the global goal
area.
|
|
52
|
- Child shows behaviors and skills expected some of the time across
situations
- Behaviors and skills are a mix of appropriate and not appropriate
- Behaviors may be more like a slightly younger child
- Some behaviors or conditions may be interfering with child’s ability to
achieve age-expected behavior and skills
|
|
53
|
- Child does not yet show behaviors and skills expected of a child of
his/her age in any situation.
- Behaviors and skills include immediate foundational skills upon which to
build age-expected skills.
- Behaviors may be more like those of a younger child
- Some behaviors or conditions may be interfering with child’s ability to
achieve age-expected behavior/skills.
|
|
54
|
- Child does not yet show behaviors and skills expected of a child of
his/her age in any situation.
- Behaviors and skills do not yet include any immediate foundational
skills upon which to build age-expected skills.
- Behaviors may be more like those of a much younger child
- Some behaviors or conditions may be seriously interfering with child’s
ability to achieve age-expected behavior and skills
|
|
55
|
- Use the in-between categories for children who have some
characteristics of two different descriptions
|
|
56
|
- On the form, the team will need to document:
- What evidence led to the selected rating
- Who participated in the conversation and decision-making
- Provides a record of the basis for the decision
|
|
57
|
- Assist the family in selecting evaluation and assessment team members
who can most appropriately assess the areas of concern
- Assure that the evaluation/assessment team includes a developmental
specialist
- Assist the family in deciding what the family’s role will be in the
assessment process
|
|
58
|
- Provide information to the family on the Making a Difference Initiative
and the Child Outcome Summary Tool
- Coordinate the sharing of evaluation and assessment information among
team members
|
|
59
|
- Coordinate and facilitate the eligibility determination and IFSP meeting
- Send or deliver the original IFSP and the completed Child Outcome
Summary Tool to the RAU for inclusion into the early intervention record
|
|
60
|
- Assist the family in selecting evaluation and assessment team members
who can most appropriately assess the areas of concern at annual
re-determination
- Assist the family in selecting a developmental specialist for the E/A
team
|
|
61
|
- Coordinate the sharing of evaluation and assessment information among
team members
- Coordinate and facilitate the annual eligibility re-determination and
IFSP meeting
- Send or deliver the original IFSP and completed Child Outcome Summary
Tool to the RAU for inclusion into the early intervention record
|
|
62
|
- To be completed within 30 days before the child’s exit from the WV Birth
to Three System
- Complete the COST, answer any questions
- Confirm family address and additional info that SC will need to complete
the Transition/Transfer form at exit
- Review the AT loan agreement (this should have been done at the 90 day
face-to-face meeting, but team could check one last time)
|
|
63
|
- WV Birth to Three will be providing ongoing clarification on the COST
through a series of Questions and Answers posted on our web site
|
|
64
|
- Developmental Specialists who attend the COST training will receive an
agreement from the State Birth to Three office to sign
- Upon receipt of signed agreement and copy of the COST training
certificate, the state office will notify the RAU of your availability
to facilitate the COST
|
|
65
|
- Send the original COST Agreement and a copy of the COST training
certificate to:
- Susan Hicks
- WV Birth to Three
- 350 Capitol Street, Room 427
- Charleston, WV 25301
|
|
66
|
|